Hong Kong safety legislation: China passes controversial laws


Protester throwing a tear-gas canister back at the policePicture copyright
AFP

Picture caption

Protests rocked Hong Kong final 12 months, sparked by a invoice supposed to allow extraditions to the mainland

China has handed a controversial safety legislation giving it new powers over Hong Kong, deepening fears for the town’s freedoms, the BBC has realized.

It’s set to criminalise secession, subversion and collusion with international forces, however can even successfully curtail protests and freedom of speech.

The transfer follows growing unrest and a widening pro-democracy motion.

Professional-democracy organisation Demosisto reacted to the information by announcing it was ceasing all operations.

Earlier Joshua Wong, one in every of Hong Kong’s most distinguished activists, stated he was leaving the group, which he had spearheaded.

However another veteran activists have stated they’ll be a part of a key march on Wednesday, regardless of the chance of arrest underneath the brand new legislation.

China has not but formally confirmed the legislation has been handed and no draft was made public beforehand, that means residents are nonetheless unclear of the measures they should abide by. The legislation may very well be carried out as early as Wednesday.

Hong Kong was handed again to China from British management in 1997, however underneath a particular settlement that assured sure rights for 50 years.

UK Overseas Secretary Dominic Raab expressed “deep concern” on the stories the legislation had been handed, saying: “This is able to be a grave step.”

The legislation has sparked demonstrations in Hong Kong because it was introduced by Beijing in Might. China says it’s wanted to sort out unrest and instability and rejects criticism as interference in its affairs.

Picture copyright
AFP

Picture caption

Critics warn the legislation will shut down dissent

What does the brand new legislation do?

The BBC has been advised that the legislation went by way of unanimously in a session of the Standing Committee of the Nationwide Folks’s Congress in Beijing.

It’s anticipated to be added to Hong Kong statute books later within the day and comes a day earlier than the 23rd anniversary of the handover from Britain to China – a date often marked by pro-democracy protests.

It will make prison any act of secession, subversion of the central authorities, terrorism and collusion with international or exterior forces.

A brand new workplace in Hong Kong would cope with nationwide safety circumstances, however would additionally produce other powers corresponding to overseeing schooling about nationwide safety in Hong Kong faculties.

As well as, the town should set up its personal nationwide safety fee to implement the legal guidelines, with a Beijing-appointed adviser.

Hong Kong’s chief govt may have the facility to nominate judges to listen to nationwide safety circumstances, a transfer which has raised fears about judicial independence.

Importantly, Beijing may have energy over how the legislation ought to be interpreted. If the legislation conflicts with any Hong Kong legislation, the Beijing legislation takes precedence.

How will it change Hong Kong?

For a lot of, the legislation undermines the freedoms that set Hong Kong other than the remainder of China and helped outline its character.

Folks in Hong Kong prize civil liberties corresponding to free speech, the fitting to protest and a completely unbiased and strong judiciary, as permitted in its mini-constitution, the Primary Regulation, agreed when the territory’s sovereignty was returned to China in 1997.

Picture copyright
Getty Photographs

Picture caption

The invoice will cement Beijing’s management of Hong Kong

In recent times, Hong Kong has seen waves of protests demanding extra rights. Final 12 months, rallies over a now-scrapped invoice allowing extraditions to the mainland turned violent and fuelled a broad pro-democracy motion.

In a video deal with to the UN Human Rights Council on Tuesday, Chief Govt Carrie Lam stated crimes underneath the brand new legislation could be clearly outlined.

She stated the legislation would solely goal a “small minority” and wouldn’t undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, including: “We respect variations in opinion.”

‘A device to suppress political agitation’

Evaluation by Stephen McDonell, BBC China correspondent

Hong Kong’s sweeping new safety legislation is a frighteningly open-ended device to suppress political agitation.

Like related legal guidelines on the Chinese language mainland it seems that it may be manipulated to fulfill the wants of the Communist Celebration as required to crush virtually any motion deemed threatening.

In contrast to elsewhere in China, Hong Kong has an unbiased judiciary. For that reason, the Celebration’s management was not going to depart interpretation of this legislation within the arms of simply any previous judges.

No. Those that’ll be allowed to preside in these issues shall be hand-picked by Carrie Lam, the town’s chief who was successfully put in by Beijing.

So, previous to the brand new safety invoice, which actions by activists – regardless of how subversive – couldn’t be handled underneath current legal guidelines? What have been “extremists” getting away with to warrant this new laws?

Bomb making? No. Smashing up buildings? No. Assembly with worldwide NGOs to speak concerning the metropolis’s deteriorating freedoms? Ahhhh. Maybe. Publicly advocating Hong Kong independence? Nearly actually.

The extra that Beijing, underneath Xi Jinping’s management, has sought to regulate Hong Kong, the extra it has pushed residents into the pro-democracy camp.

However he’s enjoying a protracted sport. Positive, handover guarantees to the UK have been made however he was not going to let some Western attachment to liberty trump loyalty to the motherland. Not on his watch. Enter the safety legislation.

What has the response been?

Democratic Celebration chief Wu Chi-wai stated he would defy a police ban on Wednesday’s “handover day” march.

He shall be joined by Figo Chan, of the Civil Human Rights Entrance, who urged folks to take to the streets, saying: “We’re conscious of the dangers of being prosecuted. However we insist on taking the lead, as we wish to inform Hongkongers to not concern.”

Police plan to have 4,000 riot officers on standby, the South China Morning Publish stories.

Saying that it could “dissolve and cease all conferences”, the Demosisto group stated that the combat towards “totalitarian oppression” must proceed in a “extra versatile method” and on “totally different fronts”.

Joshua Wong stated the legislation marked “the tip of Hong Kong that the world knew earlier than”.

President of the European Council Charles Michel stated on Tuesday that the legislation risked severely undermining Hong Kong’s autonomy, including: “We deplore this determination.”

Taiwan even warned its residents of dangers in visiting Hong Kong.

Media playback is unsupported in your gadget

Media captionThe id disaster behind Hong Kong’s protests

Washington on Monday started strikes to finish Hong Kong’s particular standing commerce relationship with the US.

On Tuesday, China stated it could reply to the removing with unspecified “countermeasures”.

The UK earlier stated it could change its immigration guidelines and supply hundreds of thousands of individuals in Hong Kong “a path to citizenship” if China went forward with the laws.



Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / /

Hong Kong safety legislation: China passes controversial laws


Protester throwing a tear gas can back at the policePicture copyright
AFP

Picture caption

Waves of protests rocked Hong Kong final yr, sparked by a invoice that would see folks extradited to China

China has handed a controversial safety legislation giving it new powers over Hong Kong, deepening fears for town’s freedoms, the BBC has discovered.

Final month China surprised town when it mentioned it might criminalise any act of secession, subversion, terrorism or collusion with international forces.

The transfer got here after offended protests final yr – sparked by one other legislation – which grew to become a pro-democracy motion.

Critics say this new legislation poses a good higher menace to Hong Kong’s id.

They warn it is going to undermine Hong Kong’s judicial independence and destroy town’s distinctive freedoms, not seen on mainland China.

A draft of the legislation was not made public earlier than it was pushed by, which suggests folks within the metropolis is not going to have seen particulars of the measures they now must abide by.

Hong Kong was handed again to China from British management in 1997, however underneath a particular settlement that assured sure rights for 50 years.

So the legislation has drawn harsh worldwide condemnation and likewise sparked demonstrations in Hong Kong ever because it was introduced by Beijing in Might.

China says the legislation is required to deal with unrest and instability within the metropolis and rejects criticism as interference in its affairs.

Picture copyright
AFP

Picture caption

Critics warn the legislation will shut down dissent

What does the brand new legislation do?

China has not formally confirmed the legislation has been handed, however the BBC has been informed that it went by unanimously in a session of the Standing Committee of the Nationwide Individuals’s Congress in Beijing.

It’s anticipated to be added to Hong Kong statute books later within the day and comes a day earlier than the 23rd anniversary of the handover from Britain to China – a date normally marked by pro-democracy protests.

It will make legal any act of secession, subversion of the central authorities, terrorism and collusion with international or exterior forces.

A brand new workplace in Hong Kong would cope with nationwide safety instances, however would additionally produce other powers akin to overseeing training about nationwide safety in Hong Kong faculties.

As well as, town should set up its personal nationwide safety fee to implement the legal guidelines, with a Beijing-appointed adviser.

Hong Kong’s chief government could have the ability to nominate judges to listen to nationwide safety instances, a transfer which has raised fears about judicial independence.

Importantly, Beijing could have energy over how the legislation needs to be interpreted. If the legislation conflicts with any Hong Kong legislation, the Beijing legislation takes precedence.

How will it change Hong Kong?

For a lot of, the very nature of the legislation undermines the freedoms that set Hong Kong other than the remainder of China – and helped outlined the character of town.

Individuals in Hong Kong prized civil liberties akin to free speech, the correct to protest and a wholly unbiased and sturdy judiciary.

Picture copyright
Getty Pictures

Picture caption

The invoice will cement Beijing’s management of Hong Kong

Critics say that in impact this legislation might silence dissent and can prolong the affect of the Chinese language Communist Get together over numerous elements of Hong Kong life.

Hong Kong’s Chief Govt Carrie Lam has beforehand dismissed such fears, saying this was a “accountable” transfer to guard the law-abiding majority.

She has mentioned that Hong Kong’s freedoms, vibrancy and core values will likely be preserved.

‘A software to suppress political agitation’

Evaluation by Stephen McDonell, BBC China correspondent

Hong Kong’s sweeping new safety legislation is a frighteningly open-ended software to suppress political agitation.

Like related legal guidelines on the Chinese language mainland it seems that it may be manipulated to satisfy the wants of the Communist Get together as required to crush virtually any motion deemed threatening.

Not like elsewhere in China, Hong Kong has an unbiased judiciary. Because of this, the Get together’s management was not going to go away interpretation of this legislation within the arms of simply any previous judges.

No. Those that’ll be allowed to preside in these issues will likely be hand-picked by Carrie Lam, town’s chief who was successfully put in by Beijing.

So. previous to the brand new safety invoice which actions by activists – regardless of how subversive – couldn’t be handled underneath current legal guidelines? What have been “extremists” getting away with to warrant this new laws?

Bomb making? No. Smashing up buildings? No. Assembly with worldwide NGO’s to speak concerning the metropolis’s deteriorating freedoms? Ahhhh. Maybe. Publicly advocating Hong Kong independence? Virtually definitely.

The extra that Beijing, underneath Xi Jinping’s management, has sought to regulate Hong Kong, the extra it has pushed residents into the pro-democracy camp.

However he’s taking part in an extended sport – and regardless of the guarantees made on the time of the handover, this was not going to proceed on his watch. Enter the safety legislation.

What has the response been?

One of many metropolis’s most distinguished activists, Joshua Wong, on Tuesday mentioned he would give up the pro-democracy group Demosisto he spearheaded till now.

Rights group Amnesty Worldwide describes the legislation as “the best menace to human rights within the metropolis’s current historical past”.

Taiwan on Tuesday even warned its residents of dangers in visiting Hong Kong.

Media playback is unsupported in your gadget

Media captionThe id disaster behind Hong Kong’s protests

However there was widespread worldwide criticism even earlier than the legislation was handed.

Washington has threatened to finish Hong Kong’s particular standing commerce relationship whereas the European Parliament voted to take China to the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice in The Hague ought to the legislation be imposed.

The UK mentioned it might change its immigration guidelines and supply tens of millions of individuals in Hong Kong “a path to citizenship” if China went forward with the laws.

Why is China imposing the legislation?

Hong Kong was handed over to China from Britain in 1997 underneath a “one nation, two methods” precept and with a mini-constitution referred to as the Primary Regulation. It allowed freedom of meeting and speech, an unbiased judiciary and a few democratic rights seen nowhere else in mainland China.

Hong Kong was additionally anticipated to enact its personal nationwide safety legislation, however its unpopularity meant that had by no means been performed.

In recent times, Hong Kong has repeatedly seen waves of protests in opposition to Beijing’s affect and demanding extra rights.

Then, in 2019, protests over an extradition legislation turned violent and advanced right into a broad anti-China and pro-democracy motion.



Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to wonderful those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of colour in entrance of his Pacific Heights house went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to wonderful individuals who made 911 calls primarily based on their prejudices.

“In these occasions of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black folks, we now have to be modern and powerful with our options. Additionally it is our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to forestall racial discrimination in all its kinds and search justice for folks once we are unable to cease discrimination from occurring,” Walton mentioned in a press release.

The laws shall be drafted with the Metropolis Legal professional’s Workplace and neighborhood teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in keeping with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There needs to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis mentioned in a press release. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of colour in public, is simply as harmful as yelling fireplace in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to write down “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In line with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple in the end reported him to legislation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automotive.

The video begins with a lady, who has since been recognized in information studies as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to determine themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is in the end became legislation nonetheless, that may not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different folks, even our constituents, for simply doing regular every day issues,” Gee mentioned. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, you recognize let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a lady was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old woman for promoting water on the road beneath her residence.

Though there may be already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee mentioned that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and non secular affiliation.

Walton isn’t the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that might categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those instances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

For those who discover our journalism priceless and related, please take into account becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to high-quality those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of coloration in entrance of his Pacific Heights house went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to high-quality individuals who made 911 calls based mostly on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black individuals, now we have to be revolutionary and powerful with our options. Additionally it is our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to stop racial discrimination in all its types and search justice for individuals once we are unable to cease discrimination from occurring,” Walton stated in an announcement.

The laws can be drafted with the Metropolis Lawyer’s Workplace and group teams such because the Human Rights Fee, based on Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There needs to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis stated in an announcement. “Calling the police on somebody that you simply label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of coloration in public, is simply as harmful as yelling hearth in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to put in writing “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In response to Juanillo’s twitter, the couple finally reported him to legislation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automobile.

The video begins with a lady, who has since been recognized in information reviews as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to establish themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is finally changed into legislation nevertheless, that may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different individuals, even our constituents, for simply doing regular day by day issues,” Gee stated. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, you understand let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a lady was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old lady for promoting water on the road beneath her house.

Though there may be already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee stated that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and spiritual affiliation.

Walton isn’t the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that will categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those circumstances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

In the event you discover our journalism helpful and related, please contemplate becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to wonderful those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of coloration in entrance of his Pacific Heights house went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to wonderful individuals who made 911 calls based mostly on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black individuals, we now have to be modern and powerful with our options. It’s also our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to stop racial discrimination in all its kinds and search justice for individuals after we are unable to cease discrimination from occurring,” Walton stated in a press release.

The laws can be drafted with the Metropolis Lawyer’s Workplace and group teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in line with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There must be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis stated in a press release. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of coloration in public, is simply as harmful as yelling fireplace in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to write down “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In line with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple finally reported him to legislation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t trouble to get out of their automotive.

The video begins with a lady, who has since been recognized in information reviews as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to determine themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is finally changed into legislation nonetheless, that may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different individuals, even our constituents, for simply doing regular day by day issues,” Gee stated. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a lady was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old woman for promoting water on the road under her house.

Though there may be already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee stated that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and spiritual affiliation.

Walton shouldn’t be the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that will categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those instances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

For those who discover our journalism useful and related, please contemplate becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to high-quality those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of coloration in entrance of his Pacific Heights house went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to high-quality individuals who made 911 calls based mostly on their prejudices.

“In these occasions of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black individuals, we now have to be modern and robust with our options. It is usually our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to forestall racial discrimination in all its kinds and search justice for individuals after we are unable to cease discrimination from occurring,” Walton mentioned in a press release.

The laws might be drafted with the Metropolis Lawyer’s Workplace and group teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in keeping with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There needs to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis mentioned in a press release. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of coloration in public, is simply as harmful as yelling fireplace in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to put in writing “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In line with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple finally reported him to regulation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automobile.

The video begins with a girl, who has since been recognized in information studies as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to establish themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is finally became regulation nonetheless, which may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different individuals, even our constituents, for simply doing regular day by day issues,” Gee mentioned. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a girl was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old woman for promoting water on the road beneath her condo.

Though there may be already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee mentioned that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and spiritual affiliation.

Walton shouldn’t be the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that will categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those circumstances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

Should you discover our journalism priceless and related, please think about becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to wonderful those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of shade in entrance of his Pacific Heights residence went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to wonderful individuals who made 911 calls primarily based on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black folks, we’ve to be modern and robust with our options. It is usually our collective duty because the Board of Supervisors to stop racial discrimination in all its varieties and search justice for folks once we are unable to cease discrimination from taking place,” Walton mentioned in an announcement.

The laws shall be drafted with the Metropolis Lawyer’s Workplace and neighborhood teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in keeping with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There must be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis mentioned in an announcement. “Calling the police on somebody that you simply label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of shade in public, is simply as harmful as yelling hearth in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to write down “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In keeping with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple in the end reported him to regulation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automobile.

The video begins with a girl, who has since been recognized in information studies as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to determine themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is in the end become regulation nevertheless, that may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different folks, even our constituents, for simply doing regular each day issues,” Gee mentioned. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, you already know let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a girl was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old woman for promoting water on the road beneath her residence.

Though there’s already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee mentioned that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and spiritual affiliation.

Walton isn’t the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that may categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those instances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

When you discover our journalism precious and related, please contemplate becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to effective those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of colour in entrance of his Pacific Heights dwelling went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to effective individuals who made 911 calls primarily based on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black folks, we now have to be progressive and powerful with our options. Additionally it is our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to forestall racial discrimination in all its varieties and search justice for folks once we are unable to cease discrimination from occurring,” Walton mentioned in a press release.

The laws shall be drafted with the Metropolis Legal professional’s Workplace and group teams such because the Human Rights Fee, based on Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There ought to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis mentioned in a press release. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of colour in public, is simply as harmful as yelling hearth in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than every week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to put in writing “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In accordance with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple in the end reported him to regulation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automotive.

The video begins with a lady, who has since been recognized in information experiences as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to determine themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is in the end was regulation nonetheless, which may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different folks, even our constituents, for simply doing regular each day issues,” Gee mentioned. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, you understand let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a lady was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old lady for promoting water on the road under her condo.

Though there may be already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee mentioned that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and spiritual affiliation.

Walton is just not the one legislator taking a look at methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that might categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those circumstances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

Should you discover our journalism helpful and related, please think about becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to high quality those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of coloration in entrance of his Pacific Heights dwelling went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to high quality individuals who made 911 calls primarily based on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black individuals, we now have to be progressive and powerful with our options. It’s also our collective accountability because the Board of Supervisors to stop racial discrimination in all its types and search justice for individuals after we are unable to cease discrimination from taking place,” Walton stated in an announcement.

The laws shall be drafted with the Metropolis Legal professional’s Workplace and neighborhood teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in accordance with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There ought to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis stated in an announcement. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of coloration in public, is simply as harmful as yelling hearth in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to put in writing “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In response to Juanillo’s twitter, the couple finally reported him to legislation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automotive.

The video begins with a girl, who has since been recognized in information studies as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to say that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to establish themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is finally become legislation nonetheless, that may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different individuals, even our constituents, for simply doing regular every day issues,” Gee stated. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, you already know let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a girl was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old woman for promoting water on the road under her condominium.

Though there’s already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee stated that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and non secular affiliation.

Walton is just not the one legislator taking a look at methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that might categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those instances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

Should you discover our journalism worthwhile and related, please think about becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /

Viral video prompts laws to nice those that make discriminatory 911 calls – The San Francisco Examiner


After a video of a pair confronting an individual of shade in entrance of his Pacific Heights dwelling went viral final week, Supervisor Shamann Walton has introduced plans for laws making discriminatory 911 calls unlawful.

Walton’s proposal, which was introduced throughout Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor’s assembly, would authorize police to nice individuals who made 911 calls based mostly on their prejudices.

“In these instances of continued systemic and systematic oppression of black folks, we’ve got to be revolutionary and powerful with our options. Additionally it is our collective duty because the Board of Supervisors to forestall racial discrimination in all its types and search justice for folks once we are unable to cease discrimination from taking place,” Walton stated in a press release.

The laws might be drafted with the Metropolis Legal professional’s Workplace and neighborhood teams such because the Human Rights Fee, in accordance with Natalie Gee, Walton’s legislative aide.

“There ought to be penalties for actions that threaten the liberty and security of others,” Human Rights Fee Director Sheryl Davis stated in a press release. “Calling the police on somebody that you just label as misplaced, merely for being black or an individual of shade in public, is simply as harmful as yelling hearth in a crowded theater.”

The announcement by Walton comes lower than per week after a video went viral depicting a white couple questioning a Filipino man named James Juanillo, who was utilizing chalk and a stencil to write down “Black Lives Matter” on the entrance of his home. In line with Juanillo’s twitter, the couple finally reported him to regulation enforcement, however the officers who arrived on the scene didn’t hassle to get out of their automobile.

The video begins with a girl, who has since been recognized in information studies as Lisa Alexander, asking Juanillo if he owned the property. She goes on to assert that she is aware of who lives in Juanillo’s home, however when he asks the couple to establish themselves, Alexander responds by saying, “We’re not doing something unlawful.”

If Walton’s proposal is finally changed into regulation nonetheless, which may now not be the case.

“We all know that this has occurred to much more different folks, even our constituents, for simply doing regular every day issues,” Gee stated. “Simply having extra video and particularly having it occur in San Francisco gave us the push of like all proper, let’s go, let’s do that.”

This isn’t the primary time {that a} 911 name has sparked controversy in San Francisco. In June of 2018 a girl was filmed calling the police on an 8-year-old lady for promoting water on the road under her condo.

Though there’s already a California statute in place that makes it unlawful to knowingly falsify a report back to the police, Gee stated that this ordinance would focus solely on 911 calls incentivized by race, gender and non secular affiliation.

Walton will not be the one legislator methods to curb discriminatory calls to police. California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, additionally introduced laws on Wednesday that might categorize racially motivated 911 calls as a hate crime and supply a civil treatment for victims of those circumstances.

Bay Area NewsCrimesan francisco news

In case you discover our journalism priceless and related, please take into account becoming a member of our Examiner membership program.
Discover out extra at www.sfexaminer.com/join/





Source link

Tagged : / / / / / / / / /